Peer-reviewed articles
Kvangraven, I.H. 2020. ‘Nobel Rebels in Disguise: Assessing the Rise and Rule of the Randomistas’, Review of Political Economy, October 12th.
Assa, J. and I.H. Kvangraven. 2021. ‘Imputing Away the Ladder: Implications of Changes in GDP Measurement for Convergence Debates and the Political Economy of Development‘, New Political Economy ,07 Jan 2021.
Debate pieces in peer-reviewed journals
Kvangraven, I.H. 2020. ‘Impoverished economics? A critical assessment of the new gold standard,’ World Development 127.
Alves, C. and I.H. Kvangraven. 2020. ‘Changing the Narrative: Economics After Covid-19‘, Review of Agrarian Studies. 10(1).
Working papers
Assa, J. and I.H. Kvangraven. 2018. Imputing Away the Ladder? Implications of Changes in National Accounting Standards for Assessing Inter-country Inequalities, GPID Research Network Working Paper 14.
Popular pieces
Reclaiming Economics After Covid-19. (with Carolina Alves) Progressive International, August 14, 2020.
Why Do Economists Have Trouble Understanding Racialized Inequalities? (with Surbhi Kesar) Institute for New Economic Thinking, August 3, 2020
If we want to tackle global inequality, we need better economic theories, openDemocracy June 11th, 2020.
Impoverished economics? Unpacking the economics Nobel Prize, openDemocracy, October 18th, 2019
200 Years of Ricardian Trade Theory: How Is This Still A Thing? Developing Economics, April 2017
Development Economics: A Study of Economies, Systems, or Methods? Developing Economics, August 2016
Why Isn’t The World Bank’s Choice of Chief Economist More Controversial? New School Economic Review, July 2016
How to Justify Teaching the Worst of Economics to Non-Economists, New School Economic Review, April 2015
